Bad news from Iraq: Roads Less Dangerous

McClatchy - U.S. convoys struggle to adjust to policy change

CAMP TAJI, Iraq — In the first month that they were in Iraq, someone threatened, shot at or tried to blow up the soldiers of the Kentucky National Guard’s B Battery, 2nd Battalion, 138th Field Artillery 12 times. Last month, there were only three such incidents.

But confirmation that the roads have become safer came a few weeks ago when a flier went up in the 2-138’s office at this base 20 miles north of Baghdad.

“Effective immediately,” it read, “assume all civilian vehicles are friendly.”

The order admonished soldiers throughout Iraq to yield to civilian drivers, allow vehicles to pass and avoid firing their weapons as they escorted convoys of concrete barriers, generators, water and food to U.S. military outposts.

It was a major reversal of a longtime policy that had made units such as the 2-138, which arrived in Iraq in August, the kings of Baghdad’s littered highways. From their hulking five-ton armored military trucks, the soldiers of the 2-138 had flashed lights, shouted through loudspeakers and fired warning shots that trained Iraqi drivers to pull over and let the nighttime convoys pass.

I know it’s McClatchy, but c’mon, as a headline “U.S. convoys struggle to adjust to policy change” is a bit much. Perhaps they should feature unemployment amongst vehicle junkyard dealers, stemming from this latest bad news.

It was better when “Iraq Resembled a Mad Max Movie.”

Comments

  1. John the Marine wrote:

    I’m cautiously optimistic about current events in Iraq. However, I’ll continue to hold my breath and wait to see what happens. God bless the troops, Merry Christmas (or for secularists: Happy comercialized mythical Christian holy day.)

  2. Bill from INDC wrote:

    Yeah, that headline would have been perfectly legit as “U.S. convoys adjust to policy change,” “U.S. convoys struggle to adjust to policy change,” or even “U.S. convoys try to adjust to policy change.”

    It’s pretty remarkable that the ROI for that has been changed. Unfortunately, while the previous ROI were necessary, some innocents were inevitably killed when they weren’t paying attention.

  3. Bill from INDC wrote:

    *Oops, in this: “U.S. convoys struggle move to adjust to policy change,” ignore/delete” struggle.

  4. Stephen wrote:

    Bill,

    Merry Christmas. I think I fixed that the way you wanted. While we’re editing comments, did you mean ROI or ROE? If ROI, what does the “I” stand for?

    Working in the financial services industry, I can only think of Return On Investment, which somehow just doesn’t seem to fit. :)