Accelerating Human Evolution

Wow! This is either huge news or the biological equivalent of cold fusion:

“We are more different genetically from people living 5,000 years ago than they were different from Neanderthals.”

MADISON — Countering a common theory that human evolution has slowed to a crawl or even stopped in modern humans, a new study examining data from an international genomics project describes the past 40,000 years as a time of supercharged evolutionary change, driven by exponential population growth and cultural shifts.

In a study published in the Dec. 10 issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a team led by University of Wisconsin-Madison anthropologist John Hawks estimates that positive selection just in the past 5,000 years alone — around the period of the Stone Age — has occurred at a rate roughly 100 times higher than any other period of human evolution. Many of the new genetic adjustments are occurring around changes in the human diet brought on by the advent of agriculture, and resistance to epidemic diseases that became major killers after the growth of human civilizations.

“In evolutionary terms, cultures that grow slowly are at a disadvantage, but the massive growth of human populations has led to far more genetic mutations,” says Hawks. “And every mutation that is advantageous to people has a chance of being selected and driven toward fixation. What we are catching is an exceptional time.”

The findings may lead to a very broad rethinking of human evolution, Hawks says, especially in the view that modern culture has essentially relaxed the need for physical genetic changes in humans to improve survival. Adds Hawks: “We are more different genetically from people living 5,000 years ago than they were different from Neanderthals.”

One of the paper’s author, John Hawks, is a blogger. His blog will surely be filled with discussion.

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Creationist Jailed for Killing Evolutionist « Innocent Bystanders on 14 Dec 2007 at 6:10 pm

    […] that, or Australia just doesn’t think that croaking one of those dirty stinkin’ Darwinists is all that […]

Comments

  1. Michael wrote:

    ^
    I couldn’t decide whether to link you or Andy as an example of a dirty stinkin’ Darwinist, so I flipped a coin and you won.

    :)

  2. Stephen wrote:

    Having just come back from seeing “No Country for Old Men,” I have to wonder about that, Michael.

  3. Michael wrote:

    Haven’t seen that yet, but a little googling tells me it’s pretty depressing. Looks good though; great cast.

  4. Stephen wrote:

    The reviews were great. And I like the Coen Brothers.

    And it was good, very good, except … well .. the ending, if you can call it that, was unsatisfactory.