NSA wiretaps, the FBI, and Attorney-gate

Attention, readers: Do not attempt to adjust your tin foil hats while reading this post.

I certainly yawned over the NSA wiretapping brouhaha. “Oh, come on, they wouldn’t do that to us, ” I said.

Hullabaloo

Many of us were told to pipe down when we complained that the Justice Department and the NSA had been involved in spying on Americans with no oversight. But now that we know that Barbara Comstock, Monica Goodling and Tim Griffin, Karl Rove’s personal smear artists, were promoted to the highest reaches of the federal police agencies with access to records on their political opponents and every other American, then it’s clear that we weren’t suspicious enough. At this point, I think we have to assume that with these people in charge and having the use of all the new powers of the Patriot Act, there have been no limits at all on the partisan, political use of the government’s investigative powers.

We also might recall that FBI Director Mueller recently admitted that the FBI had mis-used powers granted to it under the Patriot Act, accidentally!

FBI Director Robert Mueller took responsibility at a Senate hearing yesterday for poor oversight that led to agency abuses of investigative tools authorized in the Patriot Act. He sought to convince lawmakers that his agency should retain the authority to gather telephone, e-mail, travel and financial records without a judge’s approval despite recent reports of problems.

“The statute did not cause the errors. The FBI’s implementation did,” Mueller told the Senate Judiciary Committee. The dispute is over how the agency issued National Security Letters. These letters demand information from telephone and Internet access companies, universities, public interest organizations, libraries and financial and credit companies. They are issued by senior executives within the organization.

Granting extraordinary investigative powers to a government which has shown itself to be both incompetent and hyper-partisan is a bad idea.

Conservatives — we’re supposed to be in favor of small government, right? For a lot of good reasons, not just economic policy.

Comments

  1. Grim wrote:

    Won’t get any argument out of me.

  2. j wrote:

    who cares.

    this essentially amounts to nothing.

    i fault bush for f’ing up the big things.

    improper use of an investigatory provision amounts to what? a dozen dudes looked at the same thing an accountant sees. oppo researchers get investigative jobs. that’s where i want them. honestly.

    you’re next simpering snivel will be something to the effect of “what if they do it to you.” guess what? really, guess what? did clinton go down in history as the despot who destroyed the constitution because he used the irs as a weapon? not really. when progressives investigate the personal lives of republicans and launch a campaign of gay-baiting, who comes off looking bad?

    us. it will always be us. that’s just the way it is. no one weeps with republicans when they get hit. no matter how apologetic and meek he is. demoocrats see a stooped over republican, coming to them hat in hand apologizing for the audacity of having ideals yet being mortal as an opportunity for further attacks. the only way to make a democrat feel pain is to hit them.

    the thing is, this screeching harpy you quote - this blithering reptile who responded to misconduct from her own side in the event of a protester spitting on an iraq war vet by first calling it a fraud and then attacking the victim as essentially desaerving - can’t identify a single piece of fruit from this allegedly poisoned tree she’s hugging. and if no fruit ever appears, she’ll use the appearance of impropriety as the fruit and throw it at you. yes, you too.

    but no fruit will ever appear because republicans ask “is this fair” while democrats are asking “how soon will it be back from the kinkos?” republicans should be digging. there should be a coherant narrative tying dianne feinstein and her conflict of interest with milcom to the mess at building 18. you think that sounds tacky and exploitative? try googling walter reed and haliburton.

    i’ll weep for the poor fortunes of the right’s political enemies when schoolkids who can’t name their congressman can cite something about our nation apart from thomas jefferson having owned slaves and boosh being a fascist.