These aren’t the bombs we’re looking for.

GAO Faults U.S. Military Over Munitions in Iraq

The U.S. military’s faulty war plans and insufficient troops in Iraq left thousands and possibly millions of tons of conventional munitions unsecured or in the hands of insurgent groups after the 2003 invasion — allowing widespread looting of weapons and explosives used to make roadside bombs that cause the bulk of U.S. casualties, according to a government report released yesterday.

Some weapons sites remained vulnerable as recently as October 2006, according to the Government Accountability Office report, which said the unguarded sites “will likely continue to support terrorist attacks throughout the region.” For example, it said hundreds of tons of explosives at the Al Qa Qaa facility in Iraq that had been documented by the International Atomic Energy Agency were lost to theft and looting after April 9, 2003.

The WaPo neglects to mention that in Spring 2003, among our too-few troops, we did have some some (a few, not enough) guys looking for weapons. The famous WMD “exploitation team.” But when they found an Iraqi base with tons and tons of munitions spread out over acres, all they could do was satisfy themselves that it was conventional stuff, and move on.

All these errors still haunt us (and kill our troops) today.

So here’s teh plan. Blame it all on Iran. Invade them. Not find the weapons we claim they are making. Get into a quaqmire there. Blame that quagmire on interference from their neighbor - Afghanistan! .. Repeat … One “interfering neighboring” country at a time. This strategery eventually will bring us to the root of all our problems - those Maoist guerillas in Nepal.

Comments

  1. jfxgillis wrote:

    Micromanaging might be a bad thing …

    … but it’s better than no managing at all, innit?

    P.S. Pelosi on the floor closing debate. Vote momentarily.

  2. John the Marine wrote:

    Coundn’t save ourselves a lot of trouble and just surrender to Maoists now? We could give them food, oil, money and technology. After all it worked so well with N.Korea. Im sure our new Nepalese masters will treat those who surrender early with kindness and respect.

  3. markg8 wrote:

    A Nepalese guard at the dining hall Michael Yon eats at in Baghdad says he only makes $275 a week after he pays off those who got him the job. An Indian guard says he brings home $500/week for a 60 hr. week.

    I wonder how much we’re paying various contractors/headhunters/coyotes to bring them to Iraq for these dangerous lousy jobs. I wonder if the Maoists pay better? I hope nobody tells them Baathists do.