Hilarious - Uncut from the Nutroots’ own astrologer

Honestly, we wingnuts should just STFU about Armstrong. We need him to be in the Democratic Party’s inner circles.

Screenshot, just in case: astroworld.jpg

The following serious discussion of how Jupiter’s retrograde conjunction etc. was going to affect Warner’s chances in an election have to be read to be believed, and Warner’s “current transit of progressed Venus conjunct his Sun, and transiting Saturn opposite this from Gemini … bode well, … perhaps meaning national prominence for him.” Sure, Jerome.

I’m waiting for Greenwald and Beyerstein to claim this never happened.

Astroworld: Nov 6th, 2001 Virgina Governor Election

October, 2001

Jerome Armstrong

Mark Warner (D) vs. Mark Earley (R)

10-18-01
A couple notes on Mark Warner Saj Sun: 1) he will have a solar eclipse natal Sun conjunction on Dec 14th of this year; also being conjuncted by Chiron; and Pluto coming into a long progressed conjuct/trine natal(similar to Daschle’s), so he’s got some LT power moves showing starting soon!
He’s got a natal near exact Venus/Saturn in Scorpio conjunction, so he’s got dedicated supporters for his Democratic brand of compassionate conservatism politics. His current transit of progressed Venus conjunct his Sun in Saj, and transiting Saturn oppostite this from Gemini coming on over the next year, bode well, transforming the Democratic leadership in Virginia(perhaps meaning national prominence for him as well).

Warner looks to me like he’s on the verge of winning. I don’t see anything negative. Latest polls have him up 10% Bush will be returning around the 22nd or so, Earley is going to need Bush’s pulling… but I think something on a larger scale is about to break here, that could change the outcome.

We’ll see, if nothing changes over the next 10 days, I think that Earley’s natal Jupiter (that’s being transited by Jupiter), is being dragged down by his south node there as well.

10-05-01
Mark Earley, GOP running for VA Governor spot. This is a good astrological indicator here. He’s got transiting Jupiter moving over his natal Jupiter stellium in Cancer. His Jupiter is conjunt mercury, so we would look for him to have some defining things to say.

Very interesting, as Jupiter makes an exact conjunction and stations retrograde on this conjunction, a debate is held that crystallizes the election.

This Jupiter transit is very benificial, especially given his natal status, conjunct his south node. So, which ever way it goes here, it goes here. It might unravel on him, but it basically shows he is willing to say anything (even underhandingly) to get elected, and Jupiter is helping him do it. Big splashes is what he’s about right now, gambles Jupiter style pay-off for him.

Here’s a good PR on it:
Did Earley roll the dice early? Debate might be defining moment.

Also, here is a press discription and transcript where his opponent destructs, at the hand of the moderator (hmmm, sounds like Earley’s Jupiter had the Mercury co-opted~!).
Jerome - Thanks for linking me to this site. I have several comments/questions.
Where do you see Earley’s defeat in his chart? I am concerned about the very strong Jupiter return he will undergoing. I am also concerned that many of Warner’s better transits will be ending around the time of the election.

10-12-01
Although he has a strong T. Jupiter over N. Jupiter/Mercury at 14° Cancer, this is also conjunct his south node. I said that Jupiter transiting this would mean that he goes excessively into negative advertising, and perhaps could really overdo it, but that he’d obviously strike a chord. I don’t have an exact date, but T. Saturn could be conjuncting his N. Moon.
T. Mercury, when it St.D. between Oct 20-27 at 14° Libra activates the sensitive point, with a square. I think Bush’s Sun being right on this sensitive Earley spot of 14° Cancer is going to mean that he plays a role in the campaign as well.

This is one of those aspects where you have the strong note natally (Mercury/Jupiter conjunct), and the transits of both planets are activating the picture, in this case with the strongest of aspects, a square and conjunction.

Also, for Earley. His N. Mars is sta. R., in Saj, so he’s got a strong Mars. Progressed, it’s at 7° Cap 22′, and T. Mars conjuncted this point about three weeks ago(probably when his flip-flop to attack on taxes was hatched), came into full opposition of the sensitive 14Cancer a week ago as he began to attack Earley on this issue.

Also, I note that on election day, T. Mars is conjunct T. Neptune at 6° Aquarius. This is probably pretty good news for the GOP party, as I have seen good research linking Neptune with the modern GOP party.

The nagative aspect for Earley is that Saturn could be in play with his moon, and that his natal moon nodes are clearly in play. I’ve not looked into Warner much yet, but I sense him losing his luster here in the homestretch. The election looks more in the hands of Earley here, and his hiring of Castellano really means he’s going into the mud here for the win.

I will try and take more of a look at Warner soon.

Jerome - I think Earley’s Moon may be too late for a transit of Saturn. I have it for 22° 02′ Gemini at noon, so even were he born at midnight, it would still be at 15° 12′ Gemini. I also think that the exact sextile between Venus and natal Jupiter/Mercury is a significant factor, in that the n.Jupiter has such strong positive support, and there is a concurrent t.Jupiter sextile to n.Venus transit. On 11/6 the t. Sun is trine natal Jupiter. Also, not only is t.Jupiter sextile natal Venus, tr. Pluto is square n. Venus beginning around 11/12. I think these are some strong indications that he will be feeling really good.

My guess is that the current political situation will help the Republicans. Also, Virginia is a very Republican state, and this is not the time when people will abandon the party.
10-12-01
Here’s the thing that I’m struggling with. If everything looks charming and expansive for Earley, why isn’t he kicking Warner’s butt in the polls?
Here I am grasping for a straw in regards to Saturn and his moon, and you point out that the glass isn’t even half full ;)

Anyway, something gives with why Earley’s not doing well right now. Most commentators are seeing his latest attack add as a desperation move, so, I’m thinking there is some negative factor in his chart that is somewhat over-riding the seemingly positive aspects occuring. Over the past month, his best poll has him down by 4%, others have shown he’s been down as much as 12%.

It could be that it is latent and sitting there, waiting for a trigger that “excites” the conjunction, propeling him into the lead in the polls. That’s what I see with the coming Mercury aspect in transit:

N. Jupiter/Mercury ~14 Cancer, conjoined by T. Jupiter; T. Mercury Sta. D. at 14 Libra, Oct 20-27. Anyway, enough about Earley…

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. protein wisdom on 24 Jun 2006 at 11:38 pm

    Erasure (UPDATED)…

    Yesterday I linked to Dan Riehl's investigative work revealing that MyDD -- before it was one of the lynchpin sites for progressive politics and one of its founders, Jerome Armstrong, the Kos-approved political consultant (and co-a…

  2. Chris At Home on 25 Jun 2006 at 9:20 am

    More Stuff…

    I am tired of studying.Al Qaeda and Hezbollah are angry at ……

  3. Super Fun Power Hour on 25 Jun 2006 at 10:18 am

    The Ayatollahs Of kO$ola…

    The fall of Jerome Armstrong and Markos Moulitsas continues. Following kOS’ lame “rally ’round the flag boyos” speech at the DLC run NDN conference (H/T - commenter netnut) more continues to come out about the shady practices and questionable dea…

  4. Inoperable Terran » I can’t make a joke this good on 25 Jun 2006 at 11:56 am

    […] Check out an actual campaign forecast from Astrologer To The Netroots. Posted by Ian S. in […]

  5. The Plank at The Politburo Diktat on 25 Jun 2006 at 8:35 pm

    […] Those issues are: Armstrong’s troubles with the SEC; Armstrong’s relationship with Moulitsas and Moulitsas’s pattern of supporting politicians who hire Armstrong as a consultant; Moulitsas’s attempts to silence liberal bloggers from commenting on these matters; the seeming acquiescence of so many of these liberal bloggers (including Greenwald) to Moulitsas’s demands; and now, strangely, stuff like this. […]

  6. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Lazy Sunday: Things you might have missed (but probably didn’t) on 25 Jun 2006 at 9:14 pm

    […] Ko$ola broke through into big media with hit pieces by David Brooks in the Times and Jonathan Darman in Newsweek. Writes Darman of the Chairman, “Already, the strain of the spotlight is beginning to show in his growing belligerence and paranoia.” To which Jim Treacher replies (via e-mail), “Growing? Hasn’t he always been like this?” Also, note the update in the Raw Story link wondering who that mysterious nameless blogger is at Little Green Footballs that’s been goofing on Kos. Does anyone know? We should really put a name to Mister X after five years, shouldn’t we? Goldstein adds his own contribution to Ko$ola by reprinting one of Markos’s e-mails from the secret Townhouse mailing list. It’s an obvious fake; all the words are spelled correctly. The Commissar has contributed something, too, and this one isn’t fake. No wonder the nutroots are so hot for Mark Warner lately: he’s got a natal near exact Venus/Saturn in Scorpio conjunction, for god’s sake. […]

  7. ProjectLOGIC on 27 Jun 2006 at 3:21 pm

    Sherrod Brown reaches for the stars…

    The Backstreet Boys have posted a “fundraising letter” from Senate Candidate Sherrod Brown. For those of you who haven’t heard, Jerome Armstrong (who is one of Brown’s campaign advisors) is, to put it diplomatically, completely insane….

Comments

  1. Bill from INDC wrote:

    Can’t stop laughing …

  2. Joab wrote:

    Jerome will tell your astrological future. Kos reads palms.

  3. j.d. wrote:

    Someone call Chris Mooney — looks like there’s another “war on science” a-brewin’.

    Somehow I’ll bet he didn’t notice this one.

  4. TallDave wrote:

    From Reality Based Community to Psychic Friends Network.

  5. Phil Smith wrote:

    The Reality-Astrology-Based Community.

  6. canuckistani wrote:

    Pathetic.
    But I think it’s disingenuous to call flakery a liberal problem.

    http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/05/19/back.time/

    Not to mention

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2005/08/01/national/w200833D87.DTL

    Ignorance of basic science is a bipartisan problem. Will you condemn Reagan and Bush if I condemn the nutbars above?

  7. DaveS wrote:

    I didn’t realize that we all had our own personal Jupiter. Interesting.

  8. mikem wrote:

    “Will you condemn Reagan and Bush if I condemn the nutbars above?”

    Sure. Just post some of their astrological predictions, like Armstrong’s.

  9. New Yorker wrote:

    Too funny. No, really, I mean that. This is almost too funny (and ridiculous, and totally effing retarded) to be true.

    I’ve long regarded Kos & Co. with disdain, but I never considered that they could be this deep into idiocy and/or cheap con-man tactics.

    On the bright side, at least they’ve got many opportunities for new slogans - The Nutroots: Way Crazier Than Even Our Biggest Detractors Ever Imagined!

  10. Pixy Misa wrote:

    Canuckistani - You haven’t been reading this blog very long. have you?

  11. DANEgerus wrote:

    Astrology -> Stock Touting -> Politics

    Yeah… only a star gazing snake-oil salesman can… truly… advocate for SecularFundamentalists.

  12. Russell Brown wrote:

    Donald Regan: “Virtually every major move and decision the Reagans made during my time as White House Chief of Staff was cleared in advance with a woman in San Francisco who drew up horoscopes to make certain that the planets were in a favorable alignment for the enterprise.”
    http://www.astrologynow.com/Astrology.601.htm

    Still, nothing important really. Just the security of the free world …

    Cheers,
    RB

  13. commissar wrote:

    Russell,

    Bad business that. Should we repeat it?