Riverbend - The Weather Vane

Riverbend, a young Sunni Iraqi woman, writes a strongly anti-American blog. She has been so from the beginning and has always recommended that the Americans should “just go.” (May 7 2004 excerpt below)

She explicitly accuses the Americans of setting up the bombing of the Shiite Askari mosque in Samarra last month, we having “the most to gain” when “Iraqis are abducting and killing each other.” That’s her view. (Mar 17 2006 excerpt below)

Today, I will make a prediction and a recommendation.

Prediction - Within 90 days, Riverbend will be insisting that the Americans stay to protect her. Something like “Now we have Shiite Death squads, creatures of Bush’s own policy. Well, he stirred up all this internal conflict, now he has to fix it.”

Recommendation - That’s when we will know it’s time to leave.

For three years now, Sunnis like Riverbend have rejected the changes in Iraq, some with violence, others with lying, hate-filled blogs. During that time, the Shiites held back, following the counsel of al-Sistani and other leaders. Now, many Shiites have had enough and are beginning to exact a terrible retribution.

For three years, America has tried, and not succeeded, in putting down the insurgency. At times, our tactics were deemed (to put it mildly) harsh and indiscriminate. Oh? Is that so? We are just beginning to see “harsh and indiscriminate” in Iraq. The Shiites are going to kill as many Sunnis (guilty and innocent) as they need to until the terrorists are destroyed. Soon Riverbend and other Sunnis will not only be willing to tolerate an American occupation, but will be demanding it.

And then we will know that it is time to go.

Riverbend excerpts below:

May 7 2004

People are seething with anger- the pictures of Abu Ghraib and the Brits in Basrah are everywhere. Every newspaper you pick up in Baghdad has pictures of some American or British atrocity or another. It’s like a nightmare that has come to life.

I sometimes get emails asking me to propose solutions or make suggestions. Fine. Today’s lesson: don’t rape, don’t torture, don’t kill and get out while you can - while it still looks like you have a choice… Chaos? Civil war? Bloodshed? We’ll take our chances - just take your Puppets, your tanks, your smart weapons, your dumb politicians, your lies, your empty promises, your rapists, your sadistic torturers and go.

Mar 17 2006

I’m especially worried about the Arba’eeniya this year. I’m worried we’ll see more of what happened to the Askari mosque in Samarra. Most Iraqis seem to agree that the whole thing was set up by those who had most to gain by driving Iraqis apart.

The thing most worrisome about the situation now, is that discrimination based on sect has become so commonplace. For the average educated Iraqi in Baghdad, there is still scorn for all the Sunni/Shia talk. Sadly though, people are being pushed into claiming to be this or that because political parties are promoting it with every speech and every newspaper - the whole ‘us’ / ‘them’. We read constantly about how ‘We Sunnis should unite with our Shia brothers.’ or how ‘We Shia should forgive our Sunni brothers.’ (note how us Sunni and Shia sisters don’t really fit into either equation at this point). Politicians and religious figures seem to forget at the end of the day that we’re all simply Iraqis.

And what role are the occupiers playing in all of this? It’s very convenient for them, I believe. It’s all very good if Iraqis are abducting and killing each other - then they can be the neutral foreign party trying to promote peace and understanding between people who, up until the occupation, were very peaceful and understanding.

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. A worrisome sign in Iraq at The Politburo Diktat on 13 Jul 2006 at 9:31 am

    […] It might take a second reading, but Riverbend’s meaning is clear: she wants the Americans to protect the Sunnis. As I wrote 107 days ago (thanks, Alon): Prediction - Within 90 days, Riverbend will be insisting that the Americans stay to protect her. Something like “Now we have Shiite Death squads, creatures of Bush’s own policy. Well, he stirred up all this internal conflict, now he has to fix it.” […]

Comments

  1. BloodSpite wrote:

    Coming from a culture whose last thousand years or so has been steeped in violence, I’m sure it gives her much joy to name call and toss their lacksadasial approach at peace in others faces.

    Of course the Sunni’s want Peace. And so do the Shite’s. At the expense of utter annhiliation of the other.

  2. dk wrote:

    you’ve got a nerve making fun of riverbend. why don’t you go to iraq and see how you like it.

  3. BloodSpite wrote:

    Thanks. I’ve been there. Would you like my T-Shirt?

  4. John the Marine wrote:

    dk,
    You don’t have to go to hell to know it is hot. Personelly I’ve seen the region, it is not a vacation spot. Riverbend is a typical whiny Arab who is loose with the facts. She seems to like to neglect the obvious, for instance; What was so peaceful and understanding about the Baathist regime under Saddam? Is this lady kidding?

    “And what role are the occupiers playing in all of this? It’s very convenient for them, I believe. It’s all very good if Iraqis are abducting and killing each other - then they can be the neutral foreign party trying to promote peace and understanding between people who, up until the occupation, were very peaceful and understanding.”

    What she really means is; Before the coalition arrived, the Sunnis who had control (under Saddam) could peacefully, and with understanding watch a brutal regime kill not only Shias in the south but Sunni Kurds as well. And for Sunnis this was peace. After all, they were the oppressors. Now the shoe is on the other foot and she and those of her sect don’t like it.

    Hey, Riverbend. Now it is your turn in the barrel!

  5. BloodSpite wrote:

    Thanks John.

    Ironically my previous statements were not meant as humor but fact. Theres what? 5 major poltical/religious factions in Iraq.

    Each one is willing to live in peace provided the other 4 are ground completely under their heel.

    Thats the short version of it. There’s all sorts of nuances and minor tribal BS, but the end result is for the factions, It’s all; or nothing.

    And if they can’t have it, they don’t want anyone else to either.

  6. John the Marine wrote:

    Bloodspite,
    Like you, I’ve seen the area and that is why I didn’t take your observations as humor. You are absolutely right, Arabs are very tribal. Thats why Riverbend laments the passing of the old order. Back in the day her tribe ran the show. Now things have changed.

    Tribalism is the mark of a primative society which is something we in the west need to understand. These people think with a 15th century mentality. They understand only a few principles. They are; Force, Violence, Subjugation of the weak and do what ever it takes to destroy those outside your tribe (like strapping a bomb to yourself so you can earn your way into heaven by killing women and children.).

    I have to wonder, are Iraqis (or any Arabs for that matter) worth helping. I honestly don’t know anymore.

  7. BloodSpite wrote:

    In Gulf War Epsiode 1, we actually made T-Shirts that read

    “You don’t have to be crazy to set yourself on fire and run in to a enemy tank: But it sure helps!”

    But your dead on. It’s not peace thru superior firepower. Its peace thru utter destruction terror and ruling by fear.

  8. John the Marine wrote:

    My “T” Shirt said, “You and Arabia… Miserable together!” I hated being there in Gulf 1. What crappy part of the World.

  9. Rowana wrote:

    Whilst it’s true that Riverbend shouldn’t be taken as an authority - she has her prejudices like everyone else - your post seems to omit important details. And you seem to have over-simplified a lot.

    During that time, the Shiites held back, following the counsel of al-Sistani and other leaders. Now, many Shiites have had enough and are beginning to exact a terrible retribution.

    This for example. Not all Shias (as is the preferred pronunciation) held back. You’ve made Shias out to be the victims, which they were to a great extent under Sadaam, but aren’t any longer. The numbers of Shia and Sunni insurgents have been pretty similar. Idiots exist in all religions and all sects.

    The Shiites are going to kill as many Sunnis (guilty and innocent) as they need to until the terrorists are destroyed. Soon Riverbend and other Sunnis will not only be willing to tolerate an American occupation, but will be demanding it.

    Again, you’re generalising. Try not to, because it makes your arguments sound weak. Riverbend also is neither a Sunni nor a Shia, but a mixture of both. What’s your prediction for the views of those people?

  10. Alon Levy wrote:

    “Why don’t the Americans just go home? They’ve done enough damage and we hear talk of how things will fall apart in Iraq if they ‘cut and run’, but the fact is that they aren’t doing anything right now.”

    Commissar, 107 days after your 90-day prediction, Riverbend’s still telling the US to get out. Does it mean the US needs to stay in Iraq?

  11. commissar wrote:

    Alon,

    When I read Riverbend’s latest, I remembered the gist of the post, but had forgotten the prediction. But, in a way, it’s come true. Did you read the “and the Americans just stood by” post. The inference is that we should have protected the Sunnis. I’ll post on this. Thanks.

  12. Alon Levy wrote:

    You’re clutching at straws… Riverbend has always attacked the US for both causing atrocities and failing to protect Iraqis from insurgents’ atrocities.